Carousel_Arrow Chat IHT_trust_wills IR35 Login Mobile Menu Share Share Email SubMenuMobile VAT View_Gallery View_List capital_allow Triangle 2 Copy Close construction cyberpro employment_tax_shares emplyer_solutions entrepreneurs_corps fee_protect Go grant_fund Group i_Clock i_Consult i_Done i_Eligibility_Tick i_Enter i_Filter i_HMRC i_Negative i_Play i_Plus i_Reset i_Support_Legal i_Support_TaxDesk i_Support_VAT i_Tick noun_marketing_1872083 noun_online_2126759 i_download i_meet Group Copy 24 Group 18 noun_electrical_1240755 copy noun_Technology_2125422 noun_Science_2031115 i_tick_bullet_block international_tax patent_box private_client property_sdlt r_and_d reliefs_incentives Search specialist_tax status tax_indemnity valuation
icon_cookie Created with Sketch. Cookies

We use cookies on this website. You can choose to accept them all or to opt out of some. You can change your consent at any time by opening this window again

This includes all necessary technical and session cookies, plus performance, tracking and persistent cookies.

If you choose this option, we will block all performance, targeting and persistent cookies. Many parts of this site will then not work.

Please read the full details in our Cookie Statement.
Markel Tax

19 Jul 2018

Response to Royal Mencap Society v Tomlinson-Blake

In Royal Mencap Society v Tomlinson-Blake, the Court of Appeal has reversed the judgement of an earlier tribunal, which had determined that care providers must pay National Minimum Wage (NMW) to care workers for all the hours where they were available on a sleep-in shift, even when not performing work.

This judgement, which determines that NMW does not apply to hours when the carer is not providing work will come as a massive relief for care providers across the UK, as collectively they were facing underpaid sleep-in shifts back payments in the region of £400 million.

In her blog post, our colleague, Amanda Boyd, at Markel Law has referenced the case and has raised two important queries arising from the judgement:

(i) Will HMRC reimburse care providers the fines associated with the back payments already paid out? 
(ii) Can they recover the back payments paid to employees?

As Amanda notes, we do not have the answer to these queries as yet, but in recent months Markel Tax has experienced a significant increase in the number of calls concerning the National Minimum Wage/National Living Wage (NLW) from advisers seeking advice and support in relation to this complex area. 

It is clear from the above that NMW compliance is extremely high on the government agenda, and this seems to be borne out by the increased number of calls to Markel Tax. Given that all complaints by members of the public to HMRC are investigated, coupled with the punitive penalty regime, it is a risk area that advisers should be discussing with their clients. 

We have a proven track record of successfully resolving disputes and have built up a wealth of experience in this specialist area. We are currently assisting clients that already have NMW/NLW enquiries ongoing as well as assisting those who, whilst not under enquiry, are concerned by the complex nature of the legislation and wish to ensure their compliance with the NMW/NLW guidelines.
Tagged HMRC
Next article in series

19 Jul 2018

CGT relief on disposal of EIS shares

Receive your regular Markel round-up

Sign up to our monthly newsletter

Strategic partners

  • Tolleys
  • Institute of Financial Accountants
  • BTC Software
  • AccountingCPD.net
  • Lovell Consulting