Carousel_Arrow Chat icon_cookie IHT_trust_wills IR35 Combined Shape 2 Group 10 Login Mobile Menu Share Share Email SubMenuMobile Group 9 VAT View_Gallery View_List capital_allow Triangle 2 Copy Close construction cyberpro employment_tax_shares emplyer_solutions entrepreneurs_corps fee_protect Group 7 grant_fund Group i_Clock i_Consult i_Done i_Eligibility_Tick i_Enter i_Filter i_HMRC i_Negative i_Play i_Plus i_Reset i_Support_Legal i_Support_TaxDesk i_Support_VAT i_Tick noun_marketing_1872083 noun_online_2126759 i_download i_meet Group Copy 24 Group 18 noun_electrical_1240755 copy noun_Technology_2125422 noun_Science_2031115 i_tick_bullet_block international_tax patent_box private_client property_sdlt r_and_d reliefs_incentives Search specialist_tax status tax_indemnity valuation YouTube
Markel Tax

26 Jul 2018

HMRC seeks to extend the information powers

HMRC have published a consultation document setting out how they propose to increase the civil information powers, as set out by Schedule 36 Finance Act 2008. The stated purpose is to bring HMRC information powers in line with other worldwide tax jurisdictions, and to help HMRC meet deadlines when receiving requests for information from overseas jurisdictions.

Gabelle believe that the proposed changes will shape the way HMRC carry out investigations, and potentially lead to unprecedented and unfettered access to private and confidential information.

The proposed are as follows:

  • The alignment of third party notices with taxpayer notices, meaning that tribunal approval will not be needed in all cases, with only the approval of an authorised officer required.
  • A separate financial institution notice, as requests to banks are identified as the most common type.
  • The use of Schedule 36 powers to obtain information for other functions of HMRC, such as tax collection.
  • Daily penalties of up to £1,000 per day for 30 days to be extended to failure to comply with all Schedule 36 notice types.
  • An obligation on the third party not to inform the taxpayer about the notice

Markel Tax commentary

The Jiminez decision in the High Court confirmed that Schedule 36 powers are confined within the UK. As a result, HMRC now relies more on exchange of information agreements for enquiries where parties are resident overseas, and have seen a corresponding rise in incoming information requests.

The consultation document proposes wide-ranging changes off the back of a specific problem relating to overseas information requests. A more proportionate solution would be to remove the need for tribunal approval only in cases arising from overseas information requests. This also avoids the potential of such intrusive requests being made routinely.

The consultation document acknowledges a likely future increase in requests arising from the Common Reporting Standard (CRS), as this information will initiate enquiries that will lead foreign tax authorities to ask the UK for information on assets held by their residents.

There is scope, however, for a further significant increase in these requests. The briefs currently submitted to tribunals by officers of HMRC are lengthy, time-consuming and a barrier to tribunal approval being sought in many cases. A likely consequence of removing this barrier would be a stark increase in third party requests.

In the worst case scenario, where HMRC no longer need to seek Tribunal approval, there is the likelihood that the relationship between the taxpayer and the financial institution could be damaged and the taxpayer would have no knowledge why.  Furthermore, the increased burden could have the effect of souring relationships between the third party and HMRC.

Alongside the extended powers, HMRC also wish to increase the penalty for non-compliance to £1,000 per day for up to 30 days (£30,000 in total), per notice.

The negative consequences of being subject to a Schedule 36 third party notice should not be overlooked. In some cases, financial institutions will terminate or alter their relationship with an individual as a result of receiving a formal information request.

The increased powers to approach a financial institution, instead of a taxpayer, can provide HMRC with information not available directly from the first party, such as the bank’s customer records. A financial institution will keep detailed records on a customer, their habits and business affairs, and these are routinely requested as part of a Schedule 36 request to a bank.

It is also worth noting the proposal to extend HMRC’s Schedule 36 for purposes other than to check a tax position. This is a significant extension of the powers, but the proposed changes are set out in 2 paragraphs in the document, with no real detail provided to explain why HMRC should be able to gain access to financial information to collect tax, for example.

Tagged Tax Investigations
Next article in series

25 Jul 2018

Tax advice: Major changes to CGT reporting and payments and the rules regarding charging electric cars

Every year, our tax and VAT helplines receive over 55,000 calls. Each month, we provide a round-up of topical news and below is a short summary of the key points our team has been discussing with accountants in July.