Carousel_Arrow Chat IHT_trust_wills IR35 Login Mobile Menu Share Share Email SubMenuMobile VAT View_Gallery View_List capital_allow Triangle 2 Copy Close construction cyberpro employment_tax_shares emplyer_solutions entrepreneurs_corps fee_protect Go grant_fund Group i_Clock i_Consult i_Done i_Eligibility_Tick i_Enter i_Filter i_HMRC i_Negative i_Play i_Plus i_Reset i_Support_Legal i_Support_TaxDesk i_Support_VAT i_Tick noun_marketing_1872083 noun_online_2126759 i_download i_meet Group Copy 24 Group 18 noun_electrical_1240755 copy noun_Technology_2125422 noun_Science_2031115 i_tick_bullet_block international_tax patent_box private_client property_sdlt r_and_d reliefs_incentives Search specialist_tax status tax_indemnity valuation
icon_cookie Created with Sketch. Cookies

We use cookies on this website. You can choose to accept them all or to opt out of some. You can change your consent at any time by opening this window again

This includes all necessary technical and session cookies, plus performance, tracking and persistent cookies.

If you choose this option, we will block all performance, targeting and persistent cookies. Many parts of this site will then not work.

Please read the full details in our Cookie Statement.
Markel Tax

22 Mar 2018

Challenging an IR35 public sector ‘caught’ decision

Is there any formal appeal process for a Personal Service Company client who has undertaken a public sector contract deemed caught by the IR35 legislation under the off payroll working rules?

There is no formal right of appeal against a decision made by a public sector end client as to whether or not the parameters of the IR35 legislation apply. 
 
If the Personal Service Company disagrees with the decision that the contract is caught by the Intermediaries Legislation (IR35), the legislation at Section 61T Chapter 10 ITEPA 2003, Regulation 20 The Social Security (Miscellaneous Amendments No.2) Regulations 2017 does provide for the following: 
 
The end client must, upon a written request by the person who the end client is directly contracted with (who may well be an agency), provide that person with a written response to any questions raised by the person about the end client’s reasons for reaching the conclusion in the information. That written response must be provided before the end of 31 days, beginning with the day the request for it is received by the client.
 
We believe it is important that the decision be clarified as, beyond this power, the only other option for the director deemed caught by the IR35 legislation is to consider making a repayment claim as part of the annual self-assessment return filed after the end of the tax year. The concern is that by taking this action HMRC may well have no option but to open a S9A enquiry in order to undertake a full review of the circumstances. In this respect, HMRC has said “if HMRC rejects that (repayment) claim and the parties continue to disagree the matter can be resolved with a formal determination/decision and appeal to the Tribunal.” 

Here to help
With more than 75 highly skilled tax and funding specialists, advising on over 2,000 complex tax issues each year, we work with your practice to provide up to date, practical solutions. If you have a client in a similar situation, or have a tax question of your own, we're here to help on 0345 223 2727. Or to find out more about our services, email taxmarketinguk@markel.com.
Tagged IR35
Next article in series

19 Mar 2018

True cost of extending a lease?

Strategic partners

  • Tolleys
  • Institute of Financial Accountants
  • BTC Software
  • AccountingCPD.net
  • Lovell Consulting