Carousel_Arrow Chat IHT_trust_wills IR35 Combined Shape 2 Group 10 Login Mobile Menu Share Share Email SubMenuMobile Group 9 VAT View_Gallery View_List capital_allow Triangle 2 Copy Close construction cyberpro employment_tax_shares emplyer_solutions entrepreneurs_corps fee_protect Group 7 grant_fund Group i_Clock i_Consult i_Done i_Eligibility_Tick i_Enter i_Filter i_HMRC i_Negative i_Play i_Plus i_Reset i_Support_Legal i_Support_TaxDesk i_Support_VAT i_Tick noun_marketing_1872083 noun_online_2126759 i_download i_meet Group Copy 24 Group 18 noun_electrical_1240755 copy noun_Technology_2125422 noun_Science_2031115 i_tick_bullet_block international_tax patent_box private_client property_sdlt r_and_d reliefs_incentives Search specialist_tax status tax_indemnity valuation
icon_cookie Created with Sketch. Cookies

We use cookies on this website. You can choose to accept them all or to opt out of some. You can change your consent at any time by opening this window again

This includes all necessary technical and session cookies, plus performance, tracking and persistent cookies.

If you choose this option, we will block all performance, targeting and persistent cookies. Many parts of this site will then not work.

Please read the full details in our Cookie Statement.
Markel Tax

29 Oct 2018

Autumn Budget 2018 – Amendments to the UK corporation tax rules surrounding hybrid instruments and permanent establishments.

Currently there are some financial instruments that, due to the differing tax treatment cross border a tax advantage, may be obtained. To align the current UK rules with the European rules two amendments are required. One of the amendments relates to permanent establishments which have also attracted a change in themselves to prevent abuse as directed by BEPS.

On the hybrid issue the exemption for hybrids that attract the regulatory capital exemption will be redefined within the regulations to align with the European definitions.

The permanent establishment amendment seeks to address the position where a permanent establishment in a jurisdiction is recognised as such by the country of the parent company but is not recognised as a taxable presence in the jurisdiction where the permanent establishment is situated, thus creating the ability to escape in both jurisdictions. Going forward the permanent establishment will be brought into charge in at least one of the jurisdictions.

The other permanent establishment amendment, as highlighted by BEPS, relates to the abuse by groups of companies segregating their activities in the UK to claim the auxiliary activities exemption. Going forward taxable and non-taxable activities of commonly controlled permanent establishments will be amalgamated in the UK to determine the correct taxable profits of foreign companies here in the UK.

These changes largely affect large multi-national groups of companies trading cross border. The UK is seeking to ensure that its tax base is not eroded by groups using hybrid instruments or segregating its activities in the UK.

Next article in series

29 Oct 2018

Our comprehensive Autumn Budget 2018 review